<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WILLIAM HORWOOD &#187; I&#8217;M READING</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/category/imreading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>The official blog from William Horwood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:39:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SMOKE?</title>
		<link>http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/imreading/smoke/</link>
		<comments>http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/imreading/smoke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 11:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[I'M READING]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/?p=513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><em></em><a href="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/smoke.png"><img src="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/smoke.png" alt="" title="smoke" width="200" height="283" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-559" /></a><strong>This blog should be in a 'I'm viewing' category but as I don't have one, it's here....</strong> Never until now has a film director asked me to critique a film and as I love film I can’t resist the opportunity. Grzegorz Cisiecki (GC from now on) has sent me a link (see end of this blog) to his</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><em></em><a href="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/smoke.png"><img src="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/smoke.png" alt="" title="smoke" width="200" height="283" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-559" /></a><strong>This blog should be in a &#8216;I&#8217;m viewing&#8217; category but as I don&#8217;t have one, it&#8217;s here&#8230;.</strong> Never until now  has a film director asked me to critique a film and as I love film I can’t resist the opportunity. Grzegorz Cisiecki (GC from now on)  has sent me a link (see below) to his film <em>Smoke</em>, suggesting with charming but unconvincing ingenuousness:   <em>I don&#8217;t want to distract you&#8230; but I&#8217;d still like to know your opinion about my short film. I hope you will take the time to watch it (only 8 minutes). And maybe you will write a review&#8230; I hope&#8230;</em</p>
<p>I have watched the film three times and will comment rather than summarise. Therefore at this point, and in fairness to GC, you should watch the film rather than do so later through a filter of my comments. The link is:  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHyUwbBbrag">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHyUwbBbrag</a></p>
<p>…. Assuming you’ve now visited that link you’ll know that the brief summary of the film reads: ‘The story of the person who became the captive of surrealistic madness.’ I’m not sure what ‘surealistic madness is, or means, so I’m assuming this is a film telling the story of someone who has some kind of delusional psychosis in which he sees the world as if it were surreal&#8230;<br />
My approach is as an ordinary viewer, unversed in film maker- or film student-critique.  It is obviously well-made, well-lit, well-edited and uses the language of film making as I know it well enough that it doesn’t feel amateur, clunky or flawed by technique.  Its images are informed pretty clearly by the score and soundtrack.  It’s a professional piece of work.<br />
So the central question it raises for me is this: does it communicate something I’m interested in with imagery and story that has resonance and meaning? Hmmm… tricky. The subject of insanity mediated by surrealistic imagery doesn’t interest me unless the <em>protagonist</em> engages my interest and the imagery and editing seems relevant and in some way exciting.  Here the protagonist is a young man with no experience in his face and a generally blank stare: i.e. like quite a lot of young men in the university city where I live, including each of my sons at a certain stage of their lives. My actual experience of mental disturbance in the age group runs to three people, one of them one of my brothers, and their neuroses certainly showed in their faces and made them both tragic and interesting. So the hero of this film is acting a very dull version of the reality. This seems to be part of a wider problem which arises with a quite a few of the  young film-makers’ shorts I’ve seen:  they tend to use youthful actors who look like friends of the film-maker and people who have not yet lived full lives. Their faces have little expression, few lines, little portrayal either of joy of suffering. Rather they are masks which hide emotions and experience they have either not yet faced  or truly experienced. The general blankness of the faces in this film means one must rely on the surrounding imagery which, presumably, represents what the protagonist sees/remembers/ imagines/fantasises about in his mind. </p>
<p>The images are all very familiar: young women, nakedness (nearly), lesbian kissing, doors (ie portals), masked people, smoke, movement cut short or replaced with other movement and so on. In short, clichés.  Anyone of them may be found in a great deal of post 1920 art, photography and (in the case of the masks) rather brilliantly in early 19th century graphics such as those made by Goya. Without a meaningful context they offer only ambiguity  without power or resonance. Put another way <em>Smoke</em> is, to me,  the story of  an uninteresting young man journey’s through an uninteresting ‘dream’ world. In  reality madness and surrealism, apart and together,  are infinitely more disconcerting and displacing than this film conveys. For the creation  of a disconcerting world, which may or may not be illusion, have a look at Andrei Tarkovsky’s  <em>Stalker</em> – these two  links will do for now: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfowVslQBQk&amp;feature=related  &#038;amp">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfowVslQBQk&amp;feature=related  &#038;amp</a>;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQYrR4Stos4&amp;feature=related">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQYrR4Stos4&amp;feature=related</a></p>
<p>If you’ve watched <em>Smoke</em>  you’ve probably read the comments of other viewers, of which there are a lot. They remind me of the kind of not very useful supportive but uncritical comments I used to hear in writers’ groups when reading their work to each other for criticism. Everybody was far too polite. Words and short sentences such as ‘Crap’ and ‘That was total bollocks’ and ‘Christ, that was boring’ and ‘Pretentious drivel’  or ‘Fxxxing marvellous!!!!’  were sadly in short supply, though often they would have been  truer than the careful comments actually made and might have given all concerned a useful reality check. In my view GC has been let down by his fans.</p>
<p>Since Grzegorz Cisiecki has asked for my comments I’ll sum them up in the spirit of the previous paragraph: a very professional film-maker in all but the choice of subject, script, images  and actors. Find a story worth telling, with actors worth watching and I think GC will make great films. Whether his fellow film-makers and critics would approve of such market-orientated pragmatism I’ve no idea but I’ve never thought that art for art’s sake has any future without the filter of a critical marketplace. I’m just the bloke sitting in  the audience who values his time and doesn’t want it wasted on something that however well made ends up being an unsolved and boring  cross-word puzzle.</p>
<p>For a more professional and perhaps more benign comment than my own try this link: <a href="http://www.pulpmovies.com/2011/01/smoke/">http://www.pulpmovies.com/2011/01/smoke/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/imreading/smoke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SUMMER  MAGIC</title>
		<link>http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/imreading/summer-magic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/imreading/summer-magic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[I'M READING]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/?p=451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/1index1.jpg"></a><a href="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/11258318_pro.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-484" title="11258318_pro" src="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/11258318_pro.jpg" alt="" width="174" height="251" /></a>This is the time of year when Francophiles long to make a pilgrimage to South France and sit in the sun in the lee of a limestone scar, drinking wine, listening to dry, rustling vegetation stirring before hot winds and making important choices about food, shade, sleep and whether or not to move. Failing which, and stuck in England]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/1index1.jpg"></a><a href="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/11258318_pro.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-484" title="11258318_pro" src="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/11258318_pro.jpg" alt="" width="174" height="251" /></a>This is the time of year when Francophiles long to make a pilgrimage to South France and sit in the sun in the lee of a limestone scar, drinking wine, listening to dry, rustling vegetation stirring before hot winds and making important choices about food, shade, sleep and whether or not to move. Failing which, and stuck in England as they may be, there are four books and four films which combine inextricably to give a near South France experience….<br />
Most non-French readers, including me,  come to Marcel Pagnol’s two linked novels <em>Jean de Florette</em> and <em>Manon des Sources</em> by way of the two celebrated films of the same name directed by Claude Berri in the late 1980’s. Only  now have I read the novels on which the films are based, published in 1991 by QPD and Andre Deutsch.<br />
What a pleasure and joy to read such well-observed, bucolic tales.  They  have a wonderfully harsh, peasant edge of meanness, perfidy, murder, deceit and revenge. Forget <em>A Year in Provence</em> by Peter Mayle which is a soft-haired puppy dog chewing caramel chocolates by comparison. These are two tough stories about what happens when innocents get done over by the ignorant, self serving, mean-spirited communities into which they stray.   And guess what? The innocent are revenged and the guilty suffer the true torments of hell.  Very satisfactory.<br />
Pagnol (1895 &#8211; 1974) also wrote two accounts of his childhood which were also filmed, this time by Yves Robert: <em>La Gloire de mon </em><em>père</em> <a href="http://"> </a>and <em>Le Chateau de ma </em><em>mère</em> Taken together these books and the films offer great summer reading and viewing. You’ll probably need to track down a copy of the books via www.abebooks.com, whilst DVDs of the films will have to come from one of the sites that carries these older titles, but it’ll be worth it.<br />
<a href="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/1Marcel_Pagnol1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-481" title="1Marcel_Pagnol" src="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/1Marcel_Pagnol1.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="237" /></a>As for Marcel Pagnol, his Wikipedia entry<a href="http://"></a>is instructive for readers and writers alike  and in describing his careers in writing and film explains why his work sits so well in both media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/imreading/summer-magic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>STUNNINGLY GOOD</title>
		<link>http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/imthinking/stunningly-good/</link>
		<comments>http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/imthinking/stunningly-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[I'M BLOGGING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I'M READING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I'M THINKING]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/?p=452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><em></em><a href="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/scan0001.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-459" title="scan0001" src="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/scan0001-204x300.jpg" alt="" width="204" height="300" /></a>The new Insight <strong>Guide Travel Photography <em>How to take striking images</em> </strong>(ed. Tony Halliday)<strong> </strong>is on object lesson to other publishers and their editors in how to produce a great, readable, perusable  instructional book.</p> 
<p style="text-align: left;">For some bizarre reason such books are often the opposite of what you’d expect for  a visual and exciting subject with very</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/scan0001.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-459" title="scan0001" src="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/scan0001-204x300.jpg" alt="" width="204" height="300" /></a>The new Insight <strong>Guide Travel Photography <em>How to take striking images</em> </strong>(ed. Tony Halliday)<strong> </strong>is an object lesson to other publishers and their editors in how to produce a great, readable, perusable  instructional book.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">For some bizarre reason such books are often the opposite of what you’d expect for  a visual and exciting subject with very wide appeal. Example: the absolutely dreadful <strong>Canon Eos Digital Photography</strong> <em>Photo Workshop</em> by Serge Timacheff which does the nearly impossible – it combines poor picture selection, with poor picture quality, bad layout and impenetrable captions. Think that’s unusual? Don’t bother to buy this next one, just trust me: the <strong>Collins Complete Photography Course </strong>is as clunky as clunky gets and is so badly laid out that it is actually unreadable. A quick perusal of the photography section of any major book store will produce dozens more like these.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Why? There are two good reasons. First,  publishers make the dire mistake of having these books created by photographers rather than good book editors, on the dubious principle that techies must know how to create a book on their specialist subject. Usually, they don’t.  Second, photo selection is a skilled and highly creative business in  which art comes way before educational purpose. If,  like the Collins authors John Garrett and Graeme Harris, you work on the principle that images used must only illustrate the point being made (which sounds logical) you will end up with the equivalent of a restaurant which offers  unpalatable  ingredients rather than seductive dishes.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The Insight Guides are rightly famed for the brilliance of their imagery and the sharp layout of text and graphics all of which, in a great book, need to be offered in an integrated whole. It’s no accident that this new and impressive book is edited by someone who has  two decades of experience producing great travel books.  It’s evident from every page of this book that he has  exactly the corpus of editorial experience and archive materials needed to avoid techie-dom, to side-step clunkiness and do what should be done with such a rich subject: produce a celebration of imagery, colour, visual excitement and&#8230; yes&#8230; wait for it.. it’s coming&#8230; <em>instruction that you want to act on</em>. Result: exactly what is needed by a market full of people like me, who wander the globe with their cameras wondering why their images are  mediocre ; or,   as frustrating, occasionally taking really good ones only to  find they are  unable to maintain that standard with any consistency.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/scan0002.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-460" title="scan0002" src="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/scan0002-300x210.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="210" /></a>The solution, more or less guaranteed;  pay a modest £14.99  and take Tony Halliday and his team on holiday with you.  He’ll chat to you about the boring stuff – light, composition and the camera; he’ll explain the Rule of Thirds and Golden Section in a visual way you’ll instantly understand; and he’ll take the classic subjects – mountains, seascapes, city lights, peoples and safari and the rest, and shake life back into them for you. The image to the left, of Mt Valier in the French Pyrenees by the editor himself, is the kind of thing he believes that more of us could take if we followed the principles and techniques outlined in his book.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">One reason I think this book moves the genre way beyond the simply  instructional  is that it also combines some fascinating photographic travel history (and the appropriate images) with a truly classic archive of great shots by the known and less well known. It’s really good to know in whose footsteps we tread as we raise our cameras to take another image. It might just help make our own better and more memorable.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">In ten years time you’ll be looking through this book and planning the next journey and the pictures thereof with pleasure. Your Canon and Collins books will linger only as a bad dream in which you threw them out of a train window in Peru to return them to the environment from which the paper wasted in making them  should never have been wrested in the first place&#8230;</p>
<p>Link: <a href="http://www.insightguides.com/">www.insightguides.com</a></p>
<p><em>Cover price is £14.99; but it’s £8.89 on Amazon (or was when I checked). </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/imthinking/stunningly-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE VIVISECTOR</title>
		<link>http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/imreading/the-vivisector-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/imreading/the-vivisector-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[I'M READING]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/?p=415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><em></em><a href="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/PWhite.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-416" title="PWhite" src="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/PWhite.jpg" alt="" width="260" height="300" /></a>PATRICK WHITE, the Australian novelist who won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1973, has never been especially popular, commercial or comfortable to read, even for his fans. So I was surprised but pleased to see that he is one of six finalists in the ‘lost’ Man Book Prize with <em>The Vivisector</em> (1970). 
My introduction to him was very odd</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/PWhite.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-416" title="PWhite" src="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/PWhite.jpg" alt="" width="260" height="300" /></a>PATRICK WHITE, the Australian novelist who won the Nobel Prize for  Literature in 1973, has never been especially popular, commercial or  comfortable to read, even for his fans. So I was surprised but pleased  to see that he is one of six finalists in the ‘lost’ Man Book Prize with  <em>The Vivisector</em> (1970).<br />
My introduction to him was very odd. When I was in my ‘O’ level year  someone in my class who was as equally bottom-stream as myself,  presented me with White’s novel <em>Voss</em>. He explained that a  customer in his Dad’s pub had abandoned it unread among empty beer  glasses. Rather than throw it away my friend thought maybe I should have  it since, ‘you read books’.<br />
In fact, until that moment, I had never read an adult novel in my life.  Feeling complimented but obligated by this unexpected gift, I glanced at  the book on the train journey home that afternoon. I was immediately  captivated by the far-off alien world White made real and by the  occasionally strange use of grammar and language; and by something else I  shall explain in a moment.</p>
<p><em>‘There is a man here, miss, asking for your uncle,’ said Rose. And  stood breathing. ‘What man?’ asked the young woman, who was engaged  upon some embroidery of a difficult nature, at which she was now forced  to look more closely, holding the little frame to the light. ‘Or is it  perhaps a gentleman?’ .  ‘I do not know,’ said the servant. ‘It is a  kind of foreign man.’&#8230;.. </em><em>Something had made this woman  monotonous. Her big breasts moved dully as she spoke, or she would  stand, and the weight of her silences impressed itself on strangers. If  the more sensitive amongst those she served or addressed failed to look  at Rose, it was because her manner seemed to accuse the conscience, or  it could have been, more simply, that they were embarrassed by her  harelip.<br />
‘A foreigner?’ said her mistress, and her Sunday dress sighed. ‘It can only be the German.’</em></p>
<p>It was this last of several narrative hooks, the German, that pulled  me into the story and kept me there. For I had been to school in  Germany, a fact curiously ignored by my grammar school, leaving me  feeling as alien in my own country as ‘the German’, the Voss of the  title, felt in Australia.<br />
I read all of White’s novels in the years afterwards including <em>The Vivisector</em> when it was published in 1970, a first Christmas present from my first  wife. It was a shock. A story of an artist, Hurtle Duffield, dedicated  to the Australian artist Sidney Nolan on whose life it is based. A  bitter portrait of an unloving man whose engagement with women and men  is about ruthlessly dissecting them as subjects of his work. The  language is wonderful, the characters riveting but the work itself bleak  and without pleasure. It left me disturbed and I read no more of his  work, moving on to new and more cheerful authors.</p>
<p>Years later, by then an author myself, I came across White’s autobiography <em>Flaws in the Glass</em>.  The moment I began reading his bitter and cynical self portrait I  recognized Hurtle Duffield – and, it must be said, that same tendency  many young novelists (including myself then, I fear!) who  cut their  creative teeth with a detached, slightly smug and unengaged view of  things. My rejection of White was complete.<br />
Then, last year, I saw the original hard back of Voss in an Oxford  bookshop and bought it at once. Again, its brilliance and empathy  captured me.<br />
Now I find that <em>The Vivisector</em> is the potential ‘lost’ Man Booker  Prize winner. Which puts me in a quandary because I rate the author  very highly but this particular book still leaves me (I have just  re-read it) feeling low. Unlike, say, J G Farrell’s wonderfully funny  and warm <em>Troubles</em> (also short-listed for this prize) which for  now gets my first vote. But time to read all the contenders I think&#8230;  with reviews to follow.</p>
<p><strong>LINKS:</strong> The full list is: Patrick White <em>The Vivisector</em> (Vintage); Nina Bawden <em>The Birds in the Trees</em> (Virago); Shirley Hazzard <em>The Bay of Noon</em> (Virago); Mary Renault <em>Fire from Heaven</em> (Arrow); &amp; Muriel Spark <em>The Driver’s Seat</em> (Penguin); J G Farrell <em>Troubles</em> (Phoenix). Full details of the Lost Man Booker Prize and how you can vote here:  <a href="http://www.themanbookerprize.com/news/stories/1412">http://www.themanbookerprize.com/news/stories/1412</a> There is a good Wikipedia entry on Patrick White at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_White">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_White</a> and the Nobel Prizes website has an excellent critique of all his books, including <em>The Vivisector, </em> at <a href="http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/literature/articles/hansson/index.html">http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/literature/articles/hansson/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/imreading/the-vivisector-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LEAVING FINGERPRINTS</title>
		<link>http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/imreading/leaving-fingerprints/</link>
		<comments>http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/imreading/leaving-fingerprints/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[I'M READING]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/imtiaz_dharkera.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-139" title="imtiaz_dharkera" src="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/imtiaz_dharkera-231x300.jpg" alt="" width="231" height="300" /></a>Imtiaz Dharker's disembodied voice floated into my consciousness  during a moment of insomnia  when I was listening to the World Service.  It kept me awake for an hour. Dharker is  a poet who recites her poetry from memory, like ordinary living speech and not in the dirge-like... <a href="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/imblogging/leaving-fingerprints/">CLICK FOR FULL BLOG</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/imtiaz_dharkera.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-139" title="imtiaz_dharkera" src="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/imtiaz_dharkera-231x300.jpg" alt="" width="231" height="300" /></a>Imtiaz Dharker&#8217;s disembodied voice floated into my consciousness  during a moment of insomnia  when I was listening to the World Service.  It kept me awake for an hour. Dharker is  a poet who recites her poetry from memory, like ordinary living speech and not in the dirge-like style of so many poets the moment they get near a public platform. Until then I had never heard of her but after only a few poems some of her qualities became plain: humour, compassion and a rich sense of the many faces of love.</p>
<p>So now I’m reading her latest collection <em>Leaving Fingerprints</em> (Bloodaxe Books, 2009) and find my late-night impressions were right. Her theme here  combines  impermanence and the preciousness of the moment with a strong sense of the presence in that moment of ancestral shadows. As a  restless wanderer through the external landscapes of town and country and the internal territories of the mind, body and emotions,  it&#8217;s a theme that appeals to me.</p>
<p><strong>The room with two doors</strong></p>
<p>Pass the wine, we’ll leave here soon enough.<br />
We were visitors, we always knew,<br />
even though the host welcomed us,<br />
ushered us in, lit candles for us,<br />
plied us with carafes of wine.</p>
<p>It would be a mistake, however,<br />
to imagine we are free to stay<br />
in this room with two doors,<br />
drinking and eating, telling jokes,<br />
exchanging stories for ever.</p>
<p>The wind swept us in through one door<br />
and is pushing at the other.<br />
Outside, it is waiting for us, running<br />
impatient fingers through the trees,</p>
<p>waiting to take our hearts, browse through them<br />
and toss them to the earth like finished leaves.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/51DkFwSeOJL__SL500_AA300_aaa.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-149" title="51DkFwSeOJL__SL500_AA300_aaa" src="http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/51DkFwSeOJL__SL500_AA300_aaa.jpg" alt="" width="196" height="300" /></a>The blurb with <em>Leaving Fingerprints</em> has a first sentence which opens up so many lines of enquiry that it might be the start of prize-winning literary novel: <em>Imtiaz Dharker was born in Lahore, Pakistan, grew up a Muslim Calvinist in a Lahori household in Glasgow and eloped with a Hindu Indian to live in Bombay</em>…. setting up perfectly the following wonderful poem of memory, reconciliation, forgiveness and familial love:</p>
<p><strong>Green spiked hair</strong></p>
<p>So I ran away from home with a man<br />
from another country and a small suitcase<br />
that contained a pair of pink suede shoes,<br />
a passport, the condensed sayings of<br />
Chairman Mao wrapped in red underwear<br />
and a copy of <em>Les Fleurs du Mal </em> by Baudelaire.</p>
<p>At Heathrow tens years after I had left<br />
I met my father coming off a flight.<br />
Hello? I said. He said Hello, polite as ever,<br />
and walked on. I followed. Excuse me?<br />
I’m your daughter? Ah, he said, not breaking step.<br />
So are you well? And your family?<br />
I’m afraid I need to go now<br />
to catch a connecting flight.</p>
<p>A few years later at another airport<br />
I catch up with him at last.<br />
He had no memory of the incident<br />
when an unknown woman with green spiked<br />
hair accosted him in the transit lounge<br />
claiming to be his little girl</p>
<p>the one he lost<br />
the one who left with a suitcase and<br />
his only copy of the poems of Faiz.</p>
<p>But in the arrival hall the lines come back to him,<br />
<em>Give some tree the gift of green again,<br />
</em>he says, smiling at the words or me,<br />
<em>Let one bird sing</em>.</p>
<p>The green spikes in the hair of his daughter, Imtiaz, may be long gone, but she sings, how she sings.</p>
<p><em>There&#8217;s more about her work and how to obtain it at <a href="http://www.bloodaxebooks.com/titlepage.asp?isbn=1852248491">http://www.bloodaxebooks.com/titlepage.asp?isbn=1852248491</a> Make sure to watch the short video that runs at the foot of  this link. It&#8217;s a brief understated masterclass in how to present poetry.</em></p>
<p><strong><em> </em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.williamhorwood.co.uk/blog/imreading/leaving-fingerprints/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

