WORLD CLASS MUSEUMS DON’T open up on one’s doorstep everyday, but it’s just happened to me. ‘Just’ meaning towards the end of last year. But then, given that the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford is the oldest public museum in the world (dating back to 1678) its astonishing refurbishment over several years and re-opening last November does feel like yesterday. It’s taken the weeks since for the horrible truth about the new museum to dawn on me, which is that nothing changes when it comes to museums and the way they rob us of the past by putting it in aspic.
I was first taken to the Ashmolean nearly sixty years ago by my mother who wanted me to see its greatest treasure – the Alfred Jewel. This is the exquisite gold and rock crystal creation which was placed at the head of a pointer used to read manuscripts and which has the words Aelfred me heht gewyrcan worked into it. They mean ‘Alfred had me made’ and most authorities agree that the object belonged to King Alfred himself.
In those days the Ashmolean was a marvellously old fashioned, fusty, dusty, echoey place and I remember being led through its scary shadows and Egyptian mummies to look at the jewel, which I could only see by standing on tiptoe. It was – it is – a marvellous creation and though rather younger than the glass and metal sphere which lies at the heart my Hyddenworld quartet, I have no doubt that it was during that first visit to the museum in 1952, and seeing the jewel, that the seeds for Hyddenworld were sown. Certainly my love of old artefacts and the stories they can tell was born then.
Today the dust and the shadows have gone and the Alfred Jewel, like all the other objets, is to be found by way of pristine stairways, open plan spaces, plate glass stronger than steel, perfectly lit displays of everything-and-its-aunt under the sun, and a dizzying central atrium until you finally reach it and sigh. It is reduced now to just another soft-lit relic on the hit-list of the photocopied sheets which parties of school children tote around on their tick-box educational tours of this museum as all of them. Which is when the ‘but… but… but…’ doubts begin to bubble up in your mind.
I HAVE OFTEN asked myself – in fact every single time I go to a museum – what they are for and why most of them offer such an unsatisfactory experience. But none has ever confronted me with those questions so brutally as the New Ashmolean now does. I walk around, I marvel at the artifice of the displays, I read the captions general and particular and I ask myself why they leave behind such a sense of poverty in mind and spirit; and why I feel I have been exposed to much but learnt very little, if anything at all. The answers are not so difficult to find.
First, we learn very little by simply looking at them. Real learning is experiential, not through a glass darkly, and it is impossible to make any real sense of a roman coin, an exquisite piece of Japanese netsuke, or a great Tibetan bell, without spending the first, toggling the second (they are used as toggles for clothes) and hearing the third ring out. Not allowed: look, don’t touch. Look but never know.
The curators can tell you what they know, they can surround an object with context, they can produce flow maps to show where something came from, they can perform the equivalent of exhibition looping the loops, but they cannot impart real experience or even their own. You could say, ‘Ah! But look at the effect on you, William, of that first visit to the Ashmolean!’
To which I reply, it was my mother who took me, held my hand and explained one on one what the jewel was, why it is so precious, what a miracle it is that it survived, why pointers were needed to read old manuscripts, who ‘Aelfred’ was. .. and then, taking me outside into Beaumont Street where my godfather used to work as an accountant, and she worked as a secretary, said, ‘but never forget, this is where it all happens now.’
Years later I asked her what she meant. What happens? ‘Life,’ she said, as dismissive of museums as she was of Academe. No wonder I have doubts. The second of which is my dislike of seeing things behind glass, or in a pool of light, which quite obviously don’t belong there but back where they were first purloined from. Bells are the best example because clearly a bell is dead that cannot ring. Nor has a runic gravestone from Norway any place at all in the Ashmolean. It should be where it was first placed and if I had my way it would be on the next plane to Oslo.
As I and my partner are, in a truly miniscule way, patrons of the New Ashmolean (you can find our names among many more etched on plate glass on Level 3), we were invited to one of several previews of the new museum. Something very, very remarkable happened which underlines these thoughts and ought to happen routinely in every museums in the world. As a PR exercise the curators of each section of the museum were dragged out of their closets and made to stand around and about their particular gallery and answer questions from us punters. They looked rather uncomfortable, preferring I imagine the comfort zone of their secret work and places. We talked to various of them and suddenly, once they were prodded and poked sufficiently to emerge from their shells, their galleries came alive.
Now they’ve all gone, back into their cubby holes, down corridors to which we have no access, snuffling about in the trough of wonderful objects upon which the rest of us can never properly feed and, when the dark days of February turn even the brightest displays gloomy, flying off gratis to conferences in Delhi and Me-he-i-coh or however it’s pronounced, to swarm like busy well fed bees with their curator fellow bees and plot the creation of yet more new museums which will exclude us from the real experience of the objects they preserve. If you doubt me take a close look at the photos in this link, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/oxfordshire/8347232.stm which shows some New Ashmolean interiors as perfectly - and as lifelessly – as the objects displayed there. That’s the problem.
What I’d really like to see is every museum curator in the land forced to spend a day of every working week in the gallery for which he or she is responsible answering questions from ordinary folk and letting us handle objects which were never meant to be preserved for ever but made to be used, enjoyed and finally discarded.






